My Trip to Nairobi, Kenya—Conference and Safari

I have always wanted to go to Africa. The opportunity finally came when Peter Schuurman, the director of Global Scholars Canada, invited me to attend a leadership conference of Christian academics from around the world, held in Nairobi, Kenya.

Peter Schuurman and Richard Middleton in Nairobi

Before becoming a professor of biblical studies (with a focus on Old Testament), I had been a campus minister at a number of universities in Canada and the USA, where I helped ground students in a Christian worldview and facilitated their exploring its implications for their life, their fields of study, and their future work in the world.

My formal teaching career, however, took a different turn, based on the job opportunities available to me. I moved from working in public universities with students in varied academic fields to teaching the Bible to seminarians and undergraduate religion students. Yet throughout my career as a professor of biblical studies, I continued to offer (and develop) a course on the Christian worldview in dialogue with contemporary culture.

A Post-Retirement Mission

Throughout this time, I also gave talks and seminars for campus ministry groups and various Christian study centers on public university campuses. And I had opportunities to speak and write on the relevance of the Bible to matters of science on behalf of organizations like BioLogos, the Veritas Forum, and the Canadian Scientific and Christian Affiliation. As more and more such opportunities arose for this kind of integrative work, I wondered if this might be a focus for me after retirement.

I retired in 2024 and joined Global Scholars Canada a year later with this in mind. Although my primary goal in retirement is to complete a number of contracted books I am committed to write, I wanted to offer my services to Global Scholars Canada so that through them I might to help ground Christian scholars (both in Canada and beyond) more deeply in a biblical worldview, so that their Christian faith might be positively embodied in their academic vocation.

I was, therefore, delighted that Global Scholars Canada sent me as one of their delegates to the first Global Christian Scholars Leadership Conference, held in Nairobi.

The Nairobi Conference

The conference, which took place August 3–9, 2026 was sponsored by the Society of Christian Scholars, an umbrella organization that assists various national and regional societies of Christian academics throughout the world (including Global Scholars Canada) to accomplish their mission.

As the conference dates approached, I was working hard on completing a book I had been writing for Eerdmans. The book was a long-term project on 1 Samuel 1–15, in which I explored the power dynamics between God, the prophet Samuel, and Saul as Israel’s first king. I managed to complete the writing, along with a thorough edit of the whole manuscript, and then sent it off to the publisher in time to leave for Nairobi with my mind focused on the conference ahead.

After flying from Rochester to JFK, then fourteen hours to Nairobi, I was picked up at the airport with three other conference attendees, all from different countries. We were taken on a two-hour car ride to the BTL Christian International Conference Centre on the outskirts of the city.

Arriving at the BTL Christian International Conference Centre

I am deeply appreciative of the board of Global Scholars Canada for sponsoring and funding the trip. The board also invited me to recommend a younger scholar to accompany me as a mentee. I recommended Chris Landon (a doctoral student at McMaster Divinity College), whose MA thesis I had previously supervised. The board generously funded Chris’s travel, which allowed him to attend the conference and be exposed to the vision and work of Global Scholars Canada in the context of our sister organizations of international Christian academics.

Richard Middleton and Chris Landon in Nairobi

The first evening of the conference, we were welcomed with a time of sharing, singing, and dancing around an outdoor fire pit. The African singing and dancing ensemble got everyone up and in motion (even the Europeans and North Americans among us were dancing animatedly).

One of my duties at the conference was to give a plenary talk entitled “The Vocation of the Christian Scholar: Called to Image God.” This was an exposition of the place of our human calling to be God’s image (imago Dei) throughout the biblical story from Genesis to Revelation. My aim was to deepen awareness of the riches of Scripture for Christian academics in such a way that they would be inspired to embrace a biblical worldview and live it out in every dimension of life (including their academic context).

Richard’s Plenary Talk in Nairobi

I found the conference to be an inspiring and empowering experience. I learned from brothers and sisters around the globe about the particular challenges Christianity (and Christian academics) face in different countries. The group was composed of over fifty Christian scholars from twenty-four countries (in a plethora of academic disciplines); they came from national and regional organizations on every continent (Africa was the largest represented area).

Nairobi Group Picture

The Formal Program and Personal Connections

At the conference, there were multiple presentations each day, some addressing aspects of our Christian calling in academia, others reporting on the work of the various associations of Christian scholars around the world.

Many of the formal presentations helped me understand the vision and activities of the various regional and national organizations of Christian scholars, as well as the mission of the Society of Christian Scholars (as an umbrella organization) to help Christian academics around the world bring their faith to bear on their scholarship/ teaching/ mentoring/ administration (as the case may be) as a witness to Christ in academia. I also got a sense of how Global Scholars Canada is distinct and has a specific contribution to make (I’ll get to that later).

We all worshipped together at the start of each day of the program, with groups from different regions leading the worship. I found the combination of spirituality, reflection, and analysis throughout the entire conference refreshing. When the conference was over, we also worshiped on Sunday in a large prominent African church.

Church Auditorium as People Gathered for Worship

This was a pentecostal church called Christ Is the Answer Ministries (or CITAM for short), which has planted about two dozen other churches in Nairobi and environs (Nairobi proper has a population of about five million and the Greater Nairobi region has a population of nearly sixteen million). The worship was very energetic with a singing and dancing group leading the congregation in songs in both English and other African languages.

Beyond the formal programme of the conference, I was able to connect with perhaps half of the scholars on a one-to-one basis for conversations. Many collegial relationships, and even friendships, began to be formed, which I look forward to nurturing as we go forward. One scholar who sought me out was Omar Montero, a professor of architecture in Brazil, who wants help in starting a Master’s degree in Christian worldview.

Mealtime in the Conference Dining Room

I was particularly impressed with the biblical meditation presented by Rolex Cailing, a New Testament scholar who teaches at Biblical Seminary of the Philippines and the Center for Biblical Studies. He focused on how Romans 8 draws on exodus motifs, which he applied to human fragility and suffering as we live between the times.

Rolex Cailing with Richard Middleton in Nairobi

After listening to his profound analysis, I told him that his presentation resonated deeply with the doctoral thesis of Canadian New Testament scholar Sylvia Keesmaat, entitled Paul and His Story: (Re)Interpreting the Exodus Tradition, which was supervised by New Testament scholar Tom Wright at Oxford; he confirmed that this was an important source for his interpretation. He also noted that his teaching and research has drawn extensively on my own writings. We are committed to keeping in touch.

The Role of Theologians and Biblical Scholars

The scholars in attendance worked in a great variety of fields, including physics, chemistry, botany, education, psychology, literature, sociology, communications, etc. But there were about six of us (a distinct minority) with academic expertise in the disciplines of biblical studies and theology.

In my informal discussions with these scholars, it became clear that part of the motivation for our academic work was to help clarify and deepen the church’s understanding of the Christian faith. When applied to the work of global Christian scholars, this means that our academic work in theology and biblical studies has something important to contribute to the substance or content of what was referred to by many participants as a “Christian” or “biblical” worldview (often without sufficient reflection on what that means).

At one point, one of the presenters articulated two principles about how we should think about our academic work. These principles derived from Professor Danny McCain, an American who has lived and taught in Nigeria for forty years, who is the founder of the movement of global Christian scholars.

Principle #1 is that we search for truth in our academic disciplines that coheres with Scripture. Principle #2 is that we search for truth in our academic disciplines that goes beyond what is found in Scripture, but is nevertheless true. These are both excellent principles.

In our discussion time, I suggested that something was missing from these principles. Limiting ourselves to these two principles ends up marginalizing the work of theologians and biblical scholars in the global scholars community. It implicitly assumes that theology and biblical studies are not academic disciplines to be explored for truth and that what the Bible teaches is somehow obvious to every Christian.

So I proposed principle #3: that some scholars should search for truth in the Scriptures that can correct, ground, and deepen our understanding of the Christian tradition (which is what was meant by “Scripture” in principles #1 and #2).

This principle has been central to my own academic vocation and is what I hope to contribute to the arena of global Christian scholarship.

From Integration to Integrality

Rolex Cailing later presented a position paper on behalf of the Society of Christian Scholars on five attributes of Christian scholars. The integration of faith and scholarship was one of the five attributes. This paper articulated well the limits of the metaphor of “integrating” faith and scholarship, assumed to be two separate and independent items that need to be somehow brought together. The alternative model of “integrality” proposed in the paper suggests that Christian faith is the lens through which we view all of life, including scholarship. It is the larger whole into which scholarship is embedded; scholarship is transformed by being practiced in the context of this broader vision.

Integration of Separate Items versus an Integral Lens

This is similar to a distinction I have been making for a while (and which I articulated in my interview with Shiao Chong, associate director of Global Scholars Canada). Christian scholars do not stand in some neutral space outside both their faith and their scholarship to magisterially connect the two. Rather, we inhabit the Christian tradition through our lived experience and this tradition shapes and forms us into disciples of Christ.

This suggests that we need holistic transformation (what I have come to call “formative spirituality”), which results in the authentic expression of our faith in our academic practice (scholarship, teaching, mentoring, etc.). This enables us to do our academic work differently, with a posture of both confidence (it is God’s world we are studying) and humility (recognizing our epistemic limits).

This immersion in the Christian faith and a biblical worldview challenges us to discern new questions that others may not think to ask; to seek truth and understanding instead of competitive success; to be aware of suffering and brokenness in the world (including the world of scholarship); to treat students with grace and love, while holding them to high standards; to offer our research and our teaching for the benefit of other scholars; and to intentionally seek to contribute to God’s purposes for the healing and flourishing of the world.

I believe that Global Scholars Canada is further along in the understanding of integrality and holistic transformation than many other groups; this may be something we can contribute to the larger conversation. To that end, I hope to gather a group of Christian scholars trained in biblical studies and theology (some of whom are with Global Scholars Canada) to reflect together about the contribution we might make to the larger community of Christian scholars in Canada and throughout the world.

List of Scholars with Global Scholars Canada

Going on a Safari

Between the formal conference program and Sunday worship in the local church, we had the opportunity to go on a half-day safari to Nairobi National Park, just an hour’s drive from the conference centre. This is a small park within sight of the city of Nairobi. It had no elephants and the cats (lions and cheetahs) come out to hunt at dawn and dusk, so we didn’t see any.

But we did see other animals. Here are some photos (and some videos) from the trip.

Gathering at Nairobi National Park
Entering the Park
Traffic in the park (someone thought they saw a lion in the bush)
Group of antelopes
Solitary antelope
Crocodile on land
Crocodile in the water
Hippo in the water
Zebras in the distance
Zebras up close
Young rhino
Adult rhino
Adult rhino with egret
Solitary giraffe
Curious giraffe
Two giraffes
Vervet monkey
Baboon
Baboon jumped onto the van ahead of us while it was moving (and had to be chased off)
Baboon jumping onto the van I am in while we were at a rest stop

The video below was taken outside the van. I was at the back facing the baboon as it jumped up (about three feet away). They are typically looking for food and will steal backpacks or anything lying around. My adrenalin just jumped up and I raised my arms and shouted loudly to chase it away. Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to film the encounter from inside (I was a bit occupied). At the end of the video you can see me (on the left) turn around to the person next to me (I said something like, “What did I just do?!”).

Portrait of a Disgruntled Prophet

I have just submitted the completed manuscript of my book on the story of Samuel (the prophet) and Saul (Israel’s first king) to the publisher (Eerdmans). It covers 1 Samuel 1–15, with a coda on the anointing of David at the start of chapter 16 (which is Samuel’s last significant act).

When I signed the contract, my original title was Portrait of the Prophet as a Crotchety Old Man (a take-off on A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man by James Joyce). But as I’ve reflected on this, and tested that title with others, I’ve come to realize that it’s a bit off-putting. Almost everyone I spoke to preferred (and actually liked) the newer title I proposed: Portrait of a Disgruntled Prophet: Samuel’s Resistance to God and the Undoing of Saul.

The title the editorial team at Eerdmans came up with is close enough and communicates well the thrust of the book: The official title (as of September 8, 2026) is Samuel and the Undoing of Saul: How a Disgruntled Prophet Resisted God.

The Book Came from My Teaching

The book has a long history.

I started working on 1 and 2 Samuel soon after I began my full-time tenure-track faculty career. I initially taught graduate seminar courses on Samuel at Colgate Rochester Crozer Divinity School (1997–2001) and then advanced undergraduate seminars at Roberts Wesleyan University (2002–2011). These seminars were amazing learning experiences both for me and my students; my students were especially helpful in raising ethical questions about the characterization of God, Samuel, Saul, and David in the text.

In more recent years (since 2011) I taught a more focused exegesis course on 1 Samuel at Northeastern Seminary, where we were able to slow down even more to attend to the details of the text. I was thus able to further develop my understanding of Samuel’s role in the demise of Saul.

I wrote a couple of chapters on the Hannah story (1 Samuel 1–2) long ago (while I was teaching at Colgate Rochester); then I published some essays on 1 Samuel, which were expansions of paper presentations I gave at conferences. Some sections of these essays have found their way into the book.

A Long Time Coming

But I got more serious about the writing when I signed a contract with Eerdmans back in 2016. An Eerdmans acquisitions editor approached me at the 2015 Society of Biblical Literature annual meeting to ask if there was a book I would like to write for them. So I submitted the proposal and got the contract.

Initially, I thought (very optimistically) that I could finish the book in a few years (I suggested 2019). However, I had just signed a contract with Baker Academic (in 2015) to write the book that eventually became Abraham’s Silence (published in 2021). That, plus the busyness of teaching (and some health problems in 2023), significantly delayed the Samuel book.

When I retired from my faculty position at Northeastern Seminary in 2024, I really got down to writing. I completed the bulk of the book in the past two years.

Did I Write a Commentary?

I hadn’t planned on writing a commentary, but rather a thematic study of the Samuel-Saul struggle, which took the reader through the flow of the book. I guess I thought of it as a quasi-commentary.

They say that a good sculptor doesn’t impose his or her predetermined idea on the stone, but needs to follow the contours of the material as they work. That was my experience as I worked through 1 Samuel.

Once I got into the writing, I found many fascinating details of the text that cried out for interpretation, details that many commentaries jumped over or treated in a very cursory way. By following the text more carefully, I was able to deepen my initial intuitions about the power struggle between Samuel and Saul (and Samuel and God) in ways I had not anticipated.

The book ended up being longer than I had anticipated. My wrestling with the text of Samuel led me to double the length of what I had originally thought would be a short 60,000 word manuscript (though it’s still shorter than my book A New Heaven and a New Earth).

One of the last things I wrote before I submitted the manuscript to Eerdmans was a semi-humorous dialogue at the start of my Preface, which you can read here (let’s see if the publisher allows me to keep it).

That dialogue was inspired by the Prologue to Robert Farrar Capon, An Offering of Uncles: The Priesthood of Adam and the Shape of the World (New York: Sheed and Ward, 1967).

Table of Contents

The book has seventeen chapters, plus an Introduction (on my approach to interpreting 1 Samuel) and a Conclusion (on evaluating the character of Samuel). You can download the Table of Contents here.

Preface

Introduction: A Proposal for Reading Samuel

Part 1: Overture to Conflict: A Preview of Things to Come (1 Samuel 1–3)

  1. Hannah’s Resolve and the Birth of Samuel: A New Era in Israel’s History
  2. Hannah’s Vow and Victory Song: A Challenge to Israel’s Leaders
  3. From Promised Priest to Newly-Minted Prophet: Clues to God’s Role in the Story

Part 2: Interlude before Conflict: The Ark Narrative as Preemptive Warning (1 Samuel 4–6)

  1. “Why Has YHWH Defeated Us Today before the Philistines?”: The Ark in Israel’s Theology
  2. The Ark of the Covenant Is “Taken”: Philistine and Israelite Responses to the Ark
  3. “Who Can Stand before YHWH, This Holy God?”: The Return the Ark

Part 3: The Conflict Begins: Samuel Asserts His Priorities (1 Samuel 7–11)

  1. Samuel on the Cusp: The Prophet’s Finest Hour
  2. The People Request a King: A Rift Begins to Open between Samuel and God
  3. Saul Loses His Way and Finds Samuel: Prelude to Kingship
  4. The Secret Anointing: Saul is (Almost) King
  5. Saul is Publicly Acclaimed King—at Mizpah and Gilgal

Part 4: The Conflict Intensifies: Samuel Clashes with Saul (1 Samuel 12–14)

  1. Samuel’s “Farewell Speech”: The Sin of Monarchy
  2. The Beginning of Saul’s Undoing: Whose/Which Command Did He Disobey?
  3. The Fallout for Jonathan: Saul’s Oath as Overreaction

Part 5: The Climax of the Conflict: Samuel and God Part Ways (1 Samuel 15–16)

  1. Failure and Rejection at Gilgal: Saul’s Confrontation with Samuel
  2. The Question of God’s “Repentance”: Samuel’s Disagreement with YHWH
  3. Prophet on a Short Leash: Irony in Samuel’s Anointing of David

Conclusion: How Should We Judge Samuel?

Stay Tuned

I plan to post updates on the publication of the book, including various tidbits of interesting things I learned or noticed about the story as I worked on the writing. This will include things like:

Why does God shift from his promise to provide a new priest (1 Samuel 2:35) to provide a prophet instead (1 Samuel 3:19)?

Why is the title for the Ark in 1 Samuel 4:4 (“the Ark of the Covenant of YHWH of Hosts […] the Cherubim”) missing a Hebrew preposition where you would expect one (so translators have to insert what they think is appropriate)?

Why does Samuel consistently disobey God’s instructions after the people ask for a king in 1 Samuel 8?

Where is the first place in the narrative when Samuel actually obeys an instruction or command from God?

What is going on with the seemingly garbled chronological note about Saul’s reign in 1 Samuel 13:1?

How should we understand Samuel’s contradictory instructions to the newly anointed King Saul in 1 Samuel 10:7–8 (especially given the multitude of interpretations proposed)?

What sin was Saul actually condemned for in 1 Samuel 13:13–14?

And lots more to come . . .

The Ultimate Victory of God’s Kingdom (The Kingdom of God, part 6)

This is the sixth (and final) installment of an article on the Kingdom of God.

Part 1 began with Jesus’s proclamation at the start of his ministry about the kingdom of God. Part 2 looked at Jesus’s sermon at Nazareth, in which he explained the nature of the kingdom he was inaugurating.

Part 3 shifted to the biblical backstory of the kingdom, beginning with the royal calling of humanity created to image God, including how we squandered our calling through sin and violence, culminating in the tower of Babel. Part 4 traced the story of Israel from Abraham to the Babylonian exile, with a focus on the theme of “rule” (power and agency).

Part 5 picked up the story with the messianic ministry and mission of Jesus, leading to his confrontation with the powers in Jerusalem at Passover.

The current installment examines the climax of the story of the kingdom of God, as God’s purposes for creation and history come to fruition through the Messiah.

After the Babylonian exile, when Israel had returned to the land, the prophetic expectations of restoration and blessing had not been fulfilled. Israel was still oppressed by various empires (the latest being Rome) and the people were still mired in sin and injustice.

There was a growing sense in the Old Testament, however, that the problem Israel faced was greater than either the external oppression by empires or the internal sinfulness of the people—though both were certainly real.

The Supra-Human Powers of Evil

Various biblical texts make this point by using the metaphor of the chaotic sea or dangerous sea beasts to represent the supra-human power of evil that lies behind human action.

Examples include Ezekiel’s description of the Egyptian Pharaoh as a great water-monster whom God will pull out of the Nile with hooks or haul up with a net (Ezekiel 29:2–7; 32:2–4) and Jeremiah’s picture of the king Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon as a sea serpent swallowing Israel, which will be forced to disgorge its prey (Jeremiah 51:34 and 51:44). It is as if there are destructive powers that lie behind human embodiments of evil.

The book of Daniel portrays a series of four oppressive empires as ravenous, devouring beasts arising from the sea (Dan 7:1–8), noting that they will be judged by God and their power taken away (Daniel 7:9–12).

Granted, neither the sea nor great sea beasts are always used as symbols of chaos or evil in the Bible; they are portrayed positively as aspects of God’s good, though wild, creation in some texts (Genesis 1:21; Psalm 95:5 and 104:26; and Job 41:1–34).

Yet elsewhere God is said to oppose and battle the sea, Leviathan, or some form of sea serpent (Job 26:12–13; Psalm 74:14 and 89:9–10). In Isaiah 27 this symbol is used for God’s final, eschatological judgment on evil: “On that day YHWH will punish with his fierce and great and strong sword Leviathan the fleeing serpent, Leviathan the twisting serpent, and he will slay the dragon that is in the sea” (Isaiah 27:1).

The sense that there were supra-human powers of evil, which had human individuals and even empires in their grip, developed in the period between the Old and New Testaments. This led to the explicit doctrine of personified evil, both in the form of demonic forces (also called unclean spirits or principalities and powers in the New Testament) and the devil or Satan, which the book of Revelation, drawing on Old Testament imagery, calls the “great dragon” and the “ancient serpent” (Revelation 12:9).

Although many of our popular ideas about the devil and the demonic come from post-biblical literature and not the Bible itself, the Bible clearly endorses the idea that there are systemic meta-human powers of evil that constrain human behavior.

Angels (lit. “messengers”) from God often appear in the Old Testament, though there is no systematic explanation of who they are. It is not until the book of Daniel that we find the first explicit reference to angelic opposition to God, in the form of a struggle between “the prince of the kingdom of Persia” and an angel (who seems to be Gabriel), who had to be aided by another angel, Michael, “one of the chief princes” (Daniel 10:13). By the time we get to the New Testament, the idea of supra-human powers that oppress human beings and have them in their grip is standard in Jewish thinking. This underlies the Gospel stories of Jesus’s confrontation with demonic powers throughout his ministry.

Jesus could counsel his followers to love their enemies (Matthew 5:43–44; Luke 6:27–28) because he did not regard even his human opponents (Jewish or Roman) as the ultimate enemy. As Ephesians 6 puts it: “We do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places” (Ephesians 6:12).

The Clash of the Kingdoms

The clash between God’s kingdom and the powers of evil is clear from Jesus’s response to the accusation that he was casting out demons by the power of Satan, here called “Beelzebul, the ruler of the demons” (Luke 11:15). He responded that if this were true, it would mean that the kingdom of evil was divided against itself (Luke 11:18). However, “If it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come to you” (Luke 11:20).

Jesus then used a vivid metaphor to describe his work of overcoming the dominion of the Evil One: “When a strong man, fully armed, guards his castle, his property is safe. But when one stronger than he attacks him and overpowers him, he takes away his armor in which he trusted and divides his plunder.” (Luke 11:21–22) This metaphor points to Jesus’s mission to liberate Israel and all people—indeed, the entire creation—from bondage to evil. Since Passover was the symbol of the expected liberation, Jesus chose that central Jewish festival as the time of his confrontation with the powers in all their raw opposition.

But how did Jesus overpower the “strong man”? In line with his teaching about an alternative form of rule—different from gentile overlords—Jesus did not come to overcome evil by the violent use of power. Rather, he came “to give himself a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45).

By submitting himself to Roman crucifixion, Jesus disarmed the powers of evil and absorbed into himself all the brokenness and corruption of human life, all the selfishness and the violence that mars this world—to suck it out of creation, to drain the mortal wound of sin, and give us back life and health and peace instead. Although any explanation of the sacrifice of Jesus on behalf of others always falters—it is ultimately a paradox—the New testament affirms that when the Messiah offered himself as the Passover lamb for a new exodus, he effectively “takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29).

From Inauguration to Consummation—A Comprehensive Kingdom

Through his death on a cross and resurrection victory, Jesus inaugurated God’s kingdom as an alternative to the corrupt empires and dominions of this world. His resurrection is the “first fruits” of those who have died (1 Corinthians 15:20); the harvest of new creation has begun—the promised reversal of sin and death has been inaugurated.

But the reversal doesn’t happen all at once. The Bible is ruthlessly honest about the continuing struggle against evil; the clash of the kingdoms continues in our time. Yet the Scriptures envision a day when the kingdom will be consummated—bodies will be healed and human society will finally reflect God’s purposes for mercy and justice.

Throughout the Gospels, Jesus’s teaching about the kingdom of God anticipates God’s ultimate triumph over the powers of evil. In one of his parables, Jesus compares the kingdom of God to a woman who put some leaven (yeast) into a large amount of dough, in preparation for baking a loaf of bread. The yeast eventually permeated the entire loaf (Matthew 13:33; Luke 13:20–21). It may be a slow process, but the leavening of creation by the kingdom of God will be comprehensive, “far as the curse is found” (to quote the Christmas carol, “Joy to the World”).

The comprehensive nature of the kingdom of God is also portrayed in Daniel’s vision of a huge statue confronted by a small stone. The statue represents all the kingdoms of the world, whereas the stone is “not made by human hands” (representing God’s kingdom). Yet this seemingly insignificant stone strikes the statue and demolishes it; then the stone grows into a mountain that fills the entire earth (Dan 2:31–36, 44–45).

This transformation is envisioned in the book of Revelation when an angel announces, “The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Messiah, and he will reign forever and ever” (Revelation 11:15).

The growth of the messianic kingdom is nothing less than God’s redemptive purposes becoming manifest in history, till the earth is filled with the knowledge of God (or of his glory) as the waters cover the sea (Isaiah 11:9; Habakkuk 2:14). On that day, the prophet Zephaniah proclaims, “YHWH will be king over all the earth” (Zechariah 14:9).

The Human Role in the Coming Kingdom

When God comes to bring justice to the earth, even the non-human created order will respond in praise to its maker (Psalm 96:11–13). Just as earthly life was subjected to corruption by the distortion of human rule, so in the kingdom of God the earth will be restored when redeemed humans take up their rule again—this time in accordance with the principles of God’s peaceable reign.

In the Beatitudes, Jesus affirmed that “the meek [not the powerful oppressors] will inherit the earth” (Matthew 5:5) and the book of Revelation pictures a great number from many nations formed into God’s royal priesthood (God’s redeemed people), who will “reign on the earth” (Revelation 5:10); this is the restoration of the original human calling as the image of God (Genesis 1:26–28). Indeed, the redeemed will “reign forever and ever” (Revelation 22:5).

When the kingdom of God is fully established in human life, and humans image their Creator by their loving and generous exercise of power, then creation itself, which has been groaning in its bondage to corruption (Romans 8:22), will be liberated from this bondage to share in the glorious freedom of the children of God (Romans 8:19–21).

The entire biblical story from creation to eschaton—from origin to climax—testifies to God’s unshakeable purpose for the flourishing of the world. “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1); and in the end there will be “a new heavens and a new earth, in which righteousness dwells” (2 Peter 3:13).

That new creation is the fulfillment of the kingdom of God.